Prisoner's life in the balance, Games could face legal action, Heathrow practice makes perfect, Lib Dems read to expose divisions on welfare reform, ILF closure could bring court action, Call for national audit on learning disability.
So the football season is back! Very different atmosphere from that experienced during the London Olympics. Back to tribal rivalries, with expensive prima donnas, with huge egos strutting their stuff. For my football opener I went to watch my son play for Ware at Waltham Abbey’s ground. Cars park on long grass which turns to mud when wet. If you make it across the grass wheelchair users can’t access the club room or the refreshments on offer and although the ground has covered stands there is no wheelchair access to them. You can forget using the toilet for ninety minutes. Very different from the Olympic facilities and it just serves to remind us that there are still many aspects of British sport where disability and inclusion is an after thought if it's a thought at all. By the way we lost two goals to one!!
Disabled prisoner’s life in the balance as Prison Service ‘refuses to provide proper care’
Prison authorities have been accused of risking a disabled man’s life by failing to provide the 24-hour specialist care he needs while serving a prison sentence for drug smuggling.
Daniel Roque Hall, from north London, was stopped by UK Border Force officers at Heathrow airport last November with almost three kilogrammes of cocaine hidden in his wheelchair.
Roque Hall is a full-time wheelchair-user and at home has a 24-hour care package. He experiences pain and muscle spasms, fatigue, heart problems, diabetes, and difficulty with speech and swallowing, as a result of the life-limiting condition Friedreich’s ataxia (FA).
But since he began his three-year sentence at Wormwood Scrubs prison in June – after the governor assured the judge his prison could provide the support Roque Hall needed – his family say he has received nothing more than basic care.
They are seeking a judicial review of the decision to keep him in prison, but a high court judge has already decided in an interim ruling that Roque Hall is not allowed access to his own specialist doctors.
Roque Hall usually carries out exercises – with the aid of a support worker – that help him maintain muscle strength, ease his pain, and prevent further deterioration to his health.
But he has apparently been denied access to any exercise equipment in the prison hospital wing, where he is being kept.
His mother, Anne Hall, said: “He has lost a huge amount of muscle mass. His speech is much less intelligible and his breathing is much worse.”
She said her son “is scared he is going to die” in prison, while his GP is concerned that the lack of care in prison will “result in Daniel’s demise”.
Hall said: “He cannot survive in a place like that. They have no idea of basic disability awareness. He needs 24-hour care. He has no quality of life and it is deteriorating. He is in danger of dying.”
In a statement, the charity Ataxia UK said Roque Hall had been given a prison sentence and “not a death sentence”, and added: “Daniel’s balance, co-ordination and mobility is already significantly compromised by his FA, and it is vital to his future welfare that he is provided with necessary care.”
The charity said the symptoms of his condition “require round-the-clock support to sustain safety and quality of life”, while it is “essential that specialist services, appropriate to the individual’s care needs, are both fully available and in place”.
It added: “Without these services in place, health and wellbeing – both physical and emotional – will be considerably compromised as time passes.”
A Prison Service spokeswoman said: “We don’t comment on individuals.”
She added: “We have a duty of care to those sentenced to custody by the courts. As part of that duty of care, we ensure that prisoners have access to the same level of NHS services as those in the community.”
When asked by Disability News Service (DNS) whether the Prison Service would discuss the case if Roque Hall gave his permission for it to do so, the spokeswoman repeatedly refused to comment.
Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust said it was “disappointed with claims of sub-standard care as we believe that we provide good quality care to anyone detained at HMP Wormwood Scrubs”.
UPDATE: In the early hours of this morning (Friday), Anne Hall was called to University College Hospital, where she was told her son was seriously ill. He had been taken there with heart problems (tachycardia, a heart rate disorder) two days earlier. He is currently in the critical care unit. She said she found him “emaciated, barely able to speak and barely able to recognise me”. Hall told DNS that she had been telling the prison “for weeks” that her son “must be having tachycardia and he needs to be taken to hospital to be managed and they refused”.
London 2012: Games could face legal action for ‘failing disabled parents’
The organisers of London 2012 could soon be facing an embarrassing legal action, over their failure to help disabled parents sit with their children to watch Paralympic events.
As the first 60 members of the 300-strong ParalympicsGB team arrived in the athletes’ village this week, and with the opening ceremony just six days away, the London 2012 organising committee LOCOG appears to have made no effort to resolve the concerns of disabled parents planning to attend the games.
Disabled actor Melissa Chapin has been trying to work with LOCOG for the last fortnight to resolve concerns that she and other wheelchair-using parents with Paralympic tickets will not be able to sit with their children and friends.
She has been asking LOCOG to take steps to ensure that more wheelchair-users who bring their children with them to venues such as the ExCeL centre – which has mostly unreserved seating – will be able to sit next to them.
She has tickets for two days of competition at Excel – which is hosting sports such as sitting volleyball, powerlifting, table-tennis and boccia – on September 2 and 3.
On the first day, she will be joined by a wheelchair-using British Falklands veteran, her seven-year-old twins, and two personal assistants, but there is no guarantee that they are going to be able to sit together.
She has already been contacted on Twitter by 10 other disabled parents with similar concerns.
She believes LOCOG will not be able to rely on its volunteers – or “games makers” – to resolve problems on the day, because they will be swamped by disabled parents with similar seating needs.
Chapin has also pointed out that LOCOG stopped wheelchair-users from buying tickets through its website last November, forcing them instead to use an 0844 telephone number, as reported by Disability News Service.
She said this had made it impossible for disabled parents to buy tickets for themselves and their children.
LOCOG has so far refused to work with Chapin to find a solution to her concerns, or to comment on the issue to Disability News Service.
Chapin said: “It is becoming a human rights issue. It is almost impossible to make me crack, but the cracks are starting to show. The twins couldn’t believe this was happening to their mum in this day and age.”
She believes LOCOG is breaching the Equality Act and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
Meanwhile, LOCOG has struggled to explain why it chose four of the most inaccessible spots in the United Kingdom to light its four Paralympic flames.
The flames were lit by groups of scouts at the summits of the highest peaks of Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
The four flames are being transferred to the four capital cities, where they will be the focus of a day of “flame celebrations”, before they are brought together into a single flame at a ceremony in Stoke Mandeville. A 24-hour relay will then take the single flame to the opening ceremony in east London.
A LOCOG spokesman said the idea of scaling the four peaks was about “showing what people can achieve”, and that they had “wanted to do something different and unique rather than replicate the Olympic torch relay”.
He said the idea would have come from the “creatives” in LOCOG’s torch relay team, but he said: “I don’t know specifically who had that idea.”
He added: “Unfortunately it was not going to be accessible to everybody but we tried to ensure that all the groups involved had a mixture [of disabled and non-disabled people].”
He said he believed that three of the mountaineers who took part in the flame-lighting events and “at least two or three” of each of the four groups of scouts were disabled people.
London 2012: Practice makes nearly perfect for Heathrow on busiest day
Months of planning and investment in access improvements appear to have paid off for Heathrow Airport as it welcomed more than 2,000 athletes and officials on its busiest arrivals day for the London 2012 Paralympics.
Airport bosses said about 430 Paralympic wheelchair-users arrived at the airport on Wednesday (22 August), including members of teams from the USA, Canada, Russia, Australia and Thailand.
Mark Hicks, Heathrow’s head of special assistance, said it had been a “fantastic day” and the airport had “exceeded my expectations”.
But he said what the airport had done was not “ground-breaking”, but a result of hard work and listening to disabled customers.
It has also worked with the disabled children’s mobility charity Whizz-Kidz, which had audited the airport’s facilities.
The airport said its investment in access improvements ahead of the games – which included new lifts for bringing wheelchairs up to and down from aircraft, new ramps, five new buggies for transporting disabled passengers through the airport, and three new accessible toilets – would leave a “lasting accessibility legacy” at Heathrow.
But a new onsite wheelchair repair service, available throughout the London 2012 period and mostly targeted at mobility equipment damaged in transit, will not remain within the airport after the Paralympics are over.
Instead, airlines will be given a telephone number they can use to contact a company that specialises in repairs but is not based at the airport.
Hicks said the service had been used just once on Wednesday, to repair a puncture on an athlete’s wheelchair.
He said it was probably not going to be used enough to justify a permanent facility within the airport, although that could change in the future if there was enough demand and airlines agreed to fund it.
Hicks said feedback from airlines, ground-handling crews and Paralympians themselves on Wednesday was very positive.
On one Air China flight there were 40 wheelchair-users, but airport staff managed to help them all off the aircraft within about 30 minutes.
Hicks said the airport had spoken to current and retired Paralympians and other disabled passengers, and had held more than 70 test events to “practice and practice” for coping with the Paralympics.
He also visited the Parapan American Games in Mexico last November – which hosted 1,300 athletes from 24 American countries in 13 Paralympic sports – to watch how Guadalajara International Airport dealt with the arrival and departure of so many disabled passengers.
The only problems reported on Wednesday, he said, were a couple of athletes’ wheelchairs that failed to arrive because of problems at other airports.
He would not say which teams were affected, but said Heathrow lent the athletes temporary wheelchairs, while their own equipment was expected to arrive and be delivered to the athletes’ village within 24 hours.
Lib Dem activists ready again to expose coalition divisions on welfare reform
The impact of the government’s unpopular welfare reforms on disabled people is set to play a major part in next month’s Liberal Democrat party conference, thanks to the efforts of disabled party activists.
A motion due to be debated on the second day of the conference will call for an independent review of the cumulative impact of the many measures in this year’s Welfare Reform Act that are set to affect disabled people.
In June, the disabled crossbench peer Baroness [Jane] Campbell asked Maria Miller, the Conservative minister for disabled people, why the government had still not carried out an assessment of the cumulative impact of its policies on disabled people.
Her question followed a report on disabled people’s right to independent living, by the joint committee on human rights which called on the government to produce such an assessment.
The Liberal Democrat activists behind the motion – which raises a number of other concerns around the government’s welfare reforms – hope the debate will feed into a review of the party’s disability policy by its federal policy committee, which will be completed in time for the next general election in 2015.
The debate is likely to repeat the embarrassment caused to Liberal Democrat coalition ministers by a similar motion at last year’s annual conference in Birmingham, which saw a string of disabled party activists take to the platform to raise concerns about the impact of the controversial work capability assessment (WCA) on disabled people.
This year’s motion will call for a public consultation on the government’s use of the WCA and its planned new assessment to test eligibility for the benefit due to replace disability living allowance.
It will argue that the coalition’s welfare policies are “failing sick and disabled people”, and will again criticise the government’s new one-year time limit on claimants of the contributory form of employment and support allowance.
The author of the motion, George Potter, a disabled activist and member of Liberal Youth, also proposed the motion at last year’s conference, which led to a major change in the party’s welfare reform policies.
Potter said: “My hope is that a lot of people within the party will be able to feed into the policy review and that that review coupled with the motion means we will be going into the 2015 election with a party committed to radical action on disability issues.”
Potter said he believed the “vast majority” of party members would support the motion, and added: “I will be very surprised if the motion was not passed overwhelmingly by conference.”
Liberal Democrat rules mean the motion will become party policy if it is passed, although ministers, other MPs, and peers would not be bound by the vote.
Potter said he had not called in the motion for the WCA to be scrapped – as demanded in June by the British Medical Association – because he wanted to focus on measures which could “realistically be achieved”.
Kelly-Marie Blundell, a disabled activist and the party’s diversity champion for the south-east, who will move Potter’s motion at next month’s conference in Brighton, said she believed the WCA had improved since last year.
But she added: “The fact that we are coming back to conference this year with a motion points out that it has not gone far enough.”
Government could face court action over ILF closure
The government looks set to face legal action from disabled people over its decision to scrap the Independent Living Fund (ILF).
The case would be the latest in a series of high-profile judicial reviews of decisions by government departments and other public bodies to slash services and spending due to the coalition’s deficit reduction plan.
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is consulting on the proposed closure of the ILF, which will see funding passed to local authorities and the devolved administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
But activists say the plans to close the ILF – a government-funded trust which helps about 19,700 disabled people with the highest support needs – are a huge threat to disabled people’s right to independent living.
They say the money will not be ring-fenced when it is passed to local authorities, with the government’s consultation paper offering no details on how councils will be able to meet the extra costs of disabled people with high support needs who previously received ILF money.
Inclusion London now wants to hear from ILF-users who are eligible for legal aid and are interested in challenging the government’s plans and its consultation process through the courts.
Tracey Lazard, chief executive of Inclusion London, said the closure of the ILF was “a massive threat” to disabled people’s right to independent living.
She said the cost of running the fund was far lower than the comparative cost of arranging support through councils, while the need to give disabled people “choice and control” over their support was “still not embedded” within local authorities’ policies.
Lazard warned that the closure of the ILF would probably force cash-strapped local authorities to tighten their own criteria for care and support to “critical”, the highest of the four eligibility bands, in order to find money to fund former ILF-users.
She added: “There will be a lot of unmet needs, with people being forced back into residential accommodation.”
Inclusion London is working with solicitor Louise Whitfield, a judicial review expert with the legal firm Deighton Pierce Glynn, who has been involved in several cases that have challenged funding cuts by public bodies.
Activist joins former Labour minister in backing call for national audit
A leading disabled activist has joined a former Labour minister in backing calls for a national audit to discover how many people with learning difficulties have been abandoned in institutions far from their original homes.
Disability News Service (DNS) called for an audit in the wake of this month’s publication of a serious case review (SCR) into the “appalling and systematically brutal” abuse that took place at Winterbourne View, a private hospital for people with learning difficulties.
John Pring, editor of DNS, first suggested a national audit in 2003, and repeated the call last year in his book Longcare Survivors: The Biography of a Care Scandal, which details his 17-year investigation into the institutional abuse of adults with learning difficulties at the Longcare homes, near Slough.
Last week, the Care Quality Commission (CQC) backed the idea of an audit, and said too many people were living “in services away from their families and homes”.
Now Gavin Harding, co-chair of the National Forum of People with Learning Difficulties, has also backed the call for a national audit.
He said it was time the government started looking closely at how people with learning difficulties were supported.
He said: “Without a real commitment to change, Winterbourne View will happen all over again. I fear that only a death will prompt the government to take decisive action.”
He said the forum believed social services and health authorities often acted too quickly in sending people with learning difficulties to services outside their local area, particularly with young people.
Slough MP Fiona Mactaggart, a former Labour health minister, who played a leading role in securing an inquiry into the Longcare abuse scandal, has this week written to Paul Burstow, the Liberal Democrat care services minister, calling on him to act urgently.
She said: “For decades it has been clear that vulnerable people who are cared for a long way from family or responsible adults can be forgotten or ignored and thus be at far greater risk of abuse.”
She added: “I am very glad that the CQC has now added its voice to those of us who have called for action on this issue, but the government continues to find reasons to delay.
“It must act now. When people are in public care we the public must take responsibility for their well-being and safety, and unless someone knows where they are we are unlikely to be able properly to protect them.”
Steven Rose, chief executive of Choice Support, which provides support services for people with learning difficulties, said: “People are far more at risk in out-of-county placements because they are isolated from friends and family and far less likely to receive monitoring visits from local authority care managers.
“They often can’t speak up effectively for themselves and those who have their interests at heart are often hundreds of miles away.”
He said that, once people had been placed in such institutions by local authorities, it was often a case of “out of sight, out of mind”.
Rose, a leading campaigner for the rights of people with learning difficulties, added: “If we consider ourselves a civilised society where human rights are upheld then we need an audit of out-of-county placements now to establish the scale of the problem, followed by swift action that will lead to the closure of institutions where vulnerable people are inappropriately placed.”
Margaret Flynn and Vic Citarella, the authors of the Winterbourne View SCR, also backed the idea of a national audit, but said it must be as part of a “whole system check which leads to a clear plan to take action”.
They said it was time to look at the “imposed odysseys of young people and adults with learning disabilities and autism” and said there was a “compelling case for adopting a local model of commissioning [services] which is shaped by young people and adults with learning disabilities, their families and advocates”.
In his book, Pring raises concerns that over the last 30 years, thousands of people with learning difficulties appear to have been sent to live in institutions many miles from their original homes.
It is feared that many of them, often former patients of the old long-stay hospitals, have been abandoned in their new homes, without follow-up visits to check on their welfare, either from social workers or family members.
The Department of Health has suggested that it is considering the issue of out-of-area placements, but will not comment until its final report on Winterbourne View is published later this year.
News provided by John Pring at www.disabilitynewsservice.com